This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 671–685, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.62
Figure 1: Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of g-C3N4, CT and CTCN heterojunction.
Figure 2: FTIR spectra of g-C3N4, CT and CTCN heterojunction.
Figure 3: Thermogravimetric analysis plots of g-C3N4, CT and CTCN heterojunction.
Figure 4: SEM images of (a, b) g-C3N4 sheets, (c, d) CT flakes and (e, f) CTCN heterojunctions.
Figure 5: TEM images of (a, b) g-C3N4 nanosheets, (c, d) CT flakes and (e, f) CTCN heterojunction.
Figure 6: (a) UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) spectra for g-C3N4, CT and CTCN heterojunctio...
Figure 7: Photoluminescence spectra of g-C3N4, CT and CTCN heterojunction.
Figure 8: Nitrogen adsorption–desorption curves for (a) g-C3N4 (b) CT and (c) CTCN heterojunction; BET surfac...
Figure 9: Time-dependent absorption spectra of RhB degradation with the CTCN heterojunction under (a) UV ligh...
Figure 10: Kinetic curves obtained by applying (a, b, c) pseudo-first-order and (d, e, f) the modified Freundl...
Figure 11: Time-dependent absorption spectra of BPA degradation under sunlight irradiation (a) pure BPA (witho...
Figure 12: (a) Photocatalyst reusability up to three cycles and (b) powder XRD pattern of a CTCN heterojunctio...
Figure 13: Plausible mechanism of degradation of pollutants under sunlight irradiation using the CTCN heteroju...
Figure 14: Effect of scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of RhB using the CTCN heterojunction photoca...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 1571–1600, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.159
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of interfaces of (a) 0D-2D (b) 1D-2D, and (c) 2D-2D materials.
Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the preparation of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) from graphite. Reprinted ...
Figure 3: (a) Triazine, (b) tri-s-triazine (heptazine) structures of g-C3N4, (c) thermal polymerization of di...
Figure 4: The principle of (a) photoelectrochemical water splitting and (b) photocatalytic water splitting fo...
Figure 5: Band gaps and band positions of a) n-type semiconductors and b) p-type semiconductors used for nano...
Figure 6: Energy level diagrams of GO with different degrees of reduction in comparison with the potentials f...
Figure 7: (a) Comparative H2 production rate over various GO–CdS nanocomposites under visible light irradiati...
Figure 8: (a,b) TEM images of TiO2–MoS2–graphene composites and (c,d) high-resolution TEM images of TiO2–MoS2...
Figure 9: Proposed mechanism for the photocatalytic H2 generation over TiO2–MoS2–graphene composite. Reprinte...
Figure 10: Proposed mechanism of BCN-T system under visible irradiation for H2 generation, pollutant removal a...
Figure 11: (a) Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic H2 production over CaIn2S4/g–C3N4 catalysts and (b...
Figure 12: (a) Schematic diagram showing the effect of SCN acid treatment that leads to the formation of a com...
Figure 13: (a) HRTEM image of 1 wt % Au–g-C3N4 nanocomposite where the inset presents the corresponding SAED p...
Figure 14: Proposed mechanism for the enhanced electron transfer in the graphene–g-C3N4 composites for photoca...
Figure 15: Schematic illustration depicting the photosensitizer role of graphene in GR–ZnO nanocomposites for ...
Figure 16: (a) Diagram showing the superior photocatalytic activity of the Au–RGO–ZnO heterostructures, (b) re...
Figure 17: Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism of the g-C3N4–Ag3PO4 hybrid photocatalyst under visible-light irr...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 1684–1697, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.161
Figure 1: XRD patterns of (a) graphite powder, (b) GO, (c) ZnO NR, (d) CdS NP, (e) CdS–ZnO and (f) CdS–ZnO–RG...
Figure 2: UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of GO, ZnO NR, CdS NP, CdS–ZnO and CdS–ZnO–RGO nanocomposi...
Figure 3: Plots of the transformed Kubelka–Munk function vs the energy of light: (a) ZnO NR, (b) CdS NP, (c) ...
Figure 4: SEM images (a) GO sheet (b) CdS NP and (c, d) ZnO NR.
Figure 5: SEM images (a, b) CdS–ZnO binary nanocomposite and (c, d) CdS–ZnO–RGO ternary nanocomposite.
Figure 6: TEM Images (a) GO sheets, (b) CdS NP, (c) CdS–ZnO binary composite, (d) CdS–ZnO–RGO ternary composi...
Figure 7: FTIR spectra of (a) GO, (b) ZnO, (c) CdS, (d) CdS–ZnO and (e) CdS–ZnO–RGO nanocomposite.
Figure 8: UV–vis absorption spectra of GO, ZnO NR, CdS NP, CdS–ZnO and CdS–ZnO–RGO nanocomposite.
Figure 9: Time-dependent UV–vis spectra of photocatalytic degradation of MO: (a) visible light irradiation fr...
Figure 10: Kinetic curves for degradation of MO under (a) visible light irradiation from a solar simulator and...
Figure 11: Histogram showing the degradation rate (%) of MO under visible light irradiation from a solar simul...
Scheme 1: Possible mechanism of the photocatalytic activity of CdS–ZnO–RGO ternary nanocomposite for degradat...
Scheme 2: Possible mechanism of the photocatalytic activity of CdS–ZnO–RGO ternary nanocomposite for degradat...